|
Head For The Hills - How it All BeganInterview of Laurence
Golding by Satish Kumar
Resurgence Magazine (Spring 1983)
Satish writes: I am not new to walking. Even so, walking
with Laurence across Exmoor was one of life's experiences.
His kind of holidays are a true alternative to tourism and
the packaged holiday.
Satish Kumar: How did you start 'Head for the Hills?'
Laurence Golding: The idea itself
is very simple: a way to fully enjoy the countryside; to stay
in Nature for an extended period of time without having to
leave it; to make an ancient journey. But it must have all
begun in childhood. In the late 1940s my parents opened a
vegetarian guest house in Swanage, Dorset and grew organic
vegetables. Through the '50s that's where I grew up, influenced
by the landscape of the delightful Isle of Purbeck. It was
my playground. It must have stayed latent until much later
because for many years I took the countryside for granted
and had no great inclination to walk and explore. Cities were
more exciting. It was in Canada in the late '60s I rediscovered
the land.
S.K.: How did it happen?
L.G.: To the north of Montreal are
endless mountains, forests and rivers; wilderness. Friends
lived out there and I would visit them. Lost River was one
such place. We were expanding our minds in various ways. My
eyes opened to Nature.
S.K.: How long were you there?
L.G.: Almost five years, culminating
in a year spent travelling through Mexico experiencing the
peasant tradition first-hand.
S.K.: So when you were in Canada, in Nature, what sort
of feeling did the surroundings arouse in you? Surely that
must have been an inspiration to you to start something here?
L.G.: I had no thought of starting
anything. I just felt right living out, being a nomad, gathering
wood for the fire. My thoughts concerning a career turned
towards the British theatre. I had qualified as a Drama teacher,
done various things in education, been involved in light shows,
but lacked the confidence to become an actor.
When I got back to England, I was sick from
hepatitis and malaria contracted in Mexico. The first thing
I had to do was to clear my system of this illness. I did
it through nature-cure which involved dieting over a long
period. During that time I crept into theatre through an obscure
back door: taking puppet shows around schools throughout the
country. Often I would stay in Youth Hostels - there was no
money to stay anywhere more expensive. At the same time I
adopted this very strict diet and tried to get as much exercise
as possible to build up strength. Then I truly discovered
the English countryside.
After North America the quality which impressed
itself strongest over here was access. What a rare fruit of
civilisation this is. In America, apart from the National
Parks, there is no access to the landscape. People are frightened
of the land, of distance, feel it as hostile. Americans who
have come on Head for the Hills have been amazed at the way
we can walk so informally through our countryside, through
the property of people who take their livelihood from the
land, utilising an incredible network of footpaths, many easily
traceable to prehistoric sites; paths that must have begun
as animal tracks because they follow the basic shape and bones
of the land.
S.K.: Did you discover those paths while you were doing
your work with the theatre?
L.G.: Yes. At one period I was based
near Loughborough and would go into the Derbyshire Peak District
almost every weekend. That is a fascinating area. Arbor Low
stone circle is the key Neolithic feature there and from it
all the hills and valleys visible around that limestone country
are adorned with mounds, earthworks and stones. I became obsessed
with the prehistoric landscape. It's as if those people were
embellishing the country rather than asserting themselves
on it. It's as if everything they did was celebrating its
form and structure. When you walk between such places you
move a little closer to their perception.
For the next few years I was in various
companies touring all over England. But all the time it seemed
I was leaving the real show, which was happening outdoors,
in order to go into buildings; trying to attract people inside
and construct a cardboard experience. Anyway I wasn't particularly
happy in the theatre world. I couldn't make the same sort
of friends I had in Canada. It seemed a retrogressive step
to be there at all.
It was partly that discontent and partly
the increasing enthusiasm I had for just getting outside,
that formulated the very simple notion of establishing some
sort of nomadic hotel where people could be "out in it".
Rather like a 'happening' in which a group of people are brought
together in a given situation. Ours would be in order to make
a journey. The plot would be determined only by natural phenomena
- the landscape, the weather, the group dynamic. Our route
would be chosen for the way it captures the natural essence
of an area. Everything else would be arranged to heighten
the experience; aspects which intervened would be reduced
to a minimum, but we would maintain a comfortable experience
with a well-designed camp. So I resolved to do it.
S.K.: Because you like Nature and enjoy it did you think
that there were other people who would like the same sort
of experience?
L.G.: I was aware, as we all are,
that ours is an alienated society, that we no longer function
much in the landscape. We function primarily through mechanised
processes in cities and so forth. And yet here is this amazing
facility, the footpath network, all too little used, offering
a direct way to the Source. I know there are plenty of rambling
groups that go out every weekend and many enthusiastic walkers;
however if you wander any of the more remote paths you encounter
numerous obstructions. They are totally neglected. [Not any
more. The situation has improved steadily since the mid-80s]
And when you do penetrate it, there is always
the comedown at the end of the day: the retreat behind walls;
perhaps in a Youth Hostel with a rowdy party of kids that
have arrived in a Transit for some other adventure. The tranquillity
that one acquires from being out all day is shattered. Even
if you carry a pack there's the difficulty of sustaining a
wholesome diet out in the country. You can't buy what you
need in villages, so you have to find a town, get involved
with roads, traffic. Always you have to leave the wild. I
wanted to establish a facility whereby people could stay in
it and develop. So evolved the idea of a journey where you
would move on each day and so be exposed to a constant stream
of images and impressions from nature. The burden of carrying
equipment would be alleviated by a support vehicle.
S.K.: When you say that there are ramblers and rambling
groups who go for country walks, what is it that you didn't
like in their approach that you had to think of your own venture?
L.G.: The main difference was to
do something sustained, that went on for a whole week or maybe
two weeks. But one reservation I have about rambling groups
is the way they cluster together. It is more of a social event
than anything else. People walk along in a tight huddle, chattering
away, creating a noisy little capsule passing through the
countryside; not tuning to the quiet and subtle things that
are happening. It is as though they want to avoid discovering
the uniqueness of the time and place.
S.K.: So what was your initial step?
L.G.: I stopped working as an actor
in the summer of '75 resolving to start Head for the Hills
the following Spring. I had a VW microbus and lived in it
that winter while researching five, week-long routes in Dorset,
Shropshire, Derbyshire, the Yorkshire Dales and the Lake District.
This would be the skeleton of what would become, the following
year, a circuit. We could then set out in the Spring and go
from one area to the next, living nomadically, collecting
groups at little towns where we would also stock up for the
trip. I wanted it to be a nomadic lifestyle for myself and
wanted to make an economic / ecological point with the food
we were eating and the price we were charging.
While I was working out those first walks
I made many lists. By February I sold the VW, bought an old
Land Rover, collected the horsebox from the makers - I had
it built with certain modifications but it never-the-less
looked like a horsebox (we travel incognito). I proceeded
to fit it out with cupboards, bookshelves, and places to store
everything. I printed brochures, wrote to magazines and papers,
finding it almost impossible to convey what I was doing. It
was all done on a shoestring and if a penny could be saved
by doing something myself, I did it.
I managed to attract a few people - that
was the hardest thing. I have always avoided extensive advertising
so that overheads do not become unduly reflected in the cost
of the trip. I wanted people to see what they were buying;
perhaps be surprised how well one can live as a traveller
for relatively little. If you feel someone is making money
you expect some service in exchange. I wanted to avoid that,
concentrating on the mutual aspect of the experience and that
we were all contributing equally. I did eight walks with between
four and eight people on each and broke even (actually cleared
72 pence) on the season's operating costs! But within three
years, charging the same amount for a week that the government
paid dole, I had recouped the two thousand pound initial outlay.
I've been living through the business ever since.
S.K.: So you managed to get the first year together. When
you went on your first journey what was the experience, how
did you feel about the people who came?
L.G.: I remember walking out of Ulverston
in the Lake District feeling very high, acutely aware of every
twig and stone, of every shift in the sliding view. I had
walked most sides of every hill and selected a choice passage,
like a golden thread across the land. I didn't want to interfere
with people's discovery of our situation, yet I didn't want
a detail to be missed. In Derbyshire I once felt I was an
acolyte in a nature temple showing pilgrims around the precincts.
Yet few came ready to receive the experience at this level
and I was disappointed in those first walks at the way people
reduced the experience.
In leading a walk one takes on a burden
quite different from merely going on one. Everybody's difficulty
becomes your difficulty and in finding the energy to carry
through the spirit of the adventure, you risk becoming the
spearhead of everyone's experience. But clearly the walks
were working and people were finding them rewarding.
Gradually i discovered some basic techniques
to help people enter deeper into the experience I was offering.
After three years I wrote some guidelines. Everyone receives
a copy when we arrive at the first camp. It's a booklet which
explains where things are located in the camp, how they work,
how to put up and take down the little sleeping tents, and
also how to view walking as meditation.
S.K.: Have you been able to get through to people with
this idea that walking is meditation?
L.G.: Yes. We have had so many different
sorts of people and always they find a special happiness that
is to do with just being in nature. She really is the supreme
mother!
S.K.: How do you get this idea through? Do you have some
sort of technique or some way of explaining to people that
walking and being with nature is more than consuming it?
L.G.: Krishnamurti says,
When you wander among the hills, let
everything tell you the beauty and the pain of life, so that
you waken to your own sorrow and the ending of it. Meditation
is the root, the plant, the flower and the fruit. It is words
that divide the fruit, the flower, the plant and the root.
I try to set an example by taking the walk
seriously and not chatting idly. Actually if I do lose concentration
we invariably wander off the route. I stop at or just before
a significant change of view, so that the walk is phrased
by these rests. I take any opportunity to point out the direction
we are going so people can walk freely without feeling they
are following. If I can avoid being at the front I do. My
favourite position is somewhere in the middle, if not the
back.
In the 'Guidelines" are suggestions
on how to walk well-spaced without getting lost, how to regard
pace and taking rests. It may sound as though I am pre-empting
the experience but in reality some gentle instruction has
proved encouraging. For many walks I have prepared information
cards which I put daily onto a notice board for anyone who
is in the mood to read them. Apart from facts I've gleaned
about the places we visit, I have pieces by various writers
about walking and nature.
Nowadays trips are regularly at least half-full
of people who have been before. This helps enormously to get
the group into the rhythm of the thing.
S.K.: Can you describe what you see while you are walking,
what does it signify for you?
L.G.: The landscape before the 20th
century was handmade rather than machine-made. There is a
quality to it that has a certain harmony; the scale is always
correct because it was built by people for a world inhabited
by people. A road, for instance, cut by a J.C.B. has quite
another quality.
When you arrive at a place on foot, under
your own power, you come upon it gradually, able to absorb
it little by little. First, its general context at a distance,
then slightly closer, until eventually you are completely
under its aura. Then you are passing away from it and onto
the next thing that happens to dominate or catch your eye.
Each tree, each rock assumes its essential place when fully
perceived. There is something fundamental in walking-speed
that enables all the other parts of you to assimilate your
perception. Ideas clarify and focus because of that speed.
You come, for instance, upon a village with
a medieval pattern of streets and fields. You enter through
some obscure field path which turns into a field access lane,
and then you come upon the first cottages on the edge of the
village. Moving at that speed you understand so profoundly
the way of life that created the village.
Or approaching a power-line; its alien presence
getting stronger with every step until, under it, you are
tingling. And as you leave it the buzz gradually diffuses
into the sounds of nature. It is obviously an assault on the
landscape. What walker could defend it?
The wildlife you encounter, the changing
pattern of weather, of the unfolding day and the approaching
night, and the next day . . . All these things arise so clearly
out of their context and you are a part of it. All I am really
saying is that you become at one with it all and lose that
strange separation that is the main experience of modern life.
S.K.: Is there any particular event or story which you
remember?
L.G.: So many moments: camped below
The Whimble, watching the dawn across Radnor Vale, the mist
dissolving, the sun rising. Days full of rainbows; we were
once crossing the Berwyn Hills on an extraordinarily long
day, heading for a hidden valley, a Celtic sanctuary, sacred
to the hare. From the wild tops is an exquisite track which
plunges straight down into the valley. We had had a pretty
wet week, in fact it rained every day, and this shrine, where
we were to have a free day, was something of a promised land.
As we reached the last ridge a rainbow appeared right over
our valley. It was the brightest rainbow any of us had ever
seen, and it just beckoned us. We had a long stretch to cover
across the rough, boggy, heathy top and the closer we got
the brighter it shone. As we dropped into the valley, it arched
over our camp. It was so bright and so close that I had eye-ache
for two days. The following day was one of glorious sunshine
We've had some lovely encounters with farming
people. On a walk from Lancaster through the Dales to Ripon
we stayed with a farmer who had learnt so many stories - like
Stanley Holloway monologues. They were a sort of hearth-side
entertainment. He loved to perform one or two in the big tent.
They were brilliantly told and very witty.
Then there is Mrs. Jones in mid-Wales, in
her eighties. Her eyes are always twinkling with excitement
and pleasure that we are there sharing her love of the countryside.
She talks with animation about the local springs, about the
fine herbage of her farm and how fine was the milk and butter.
For her it is so precise.
Only a few miles away is a lady who every
year makes us tea and shows us the church. Once we came by
to find her distressed by the death of her husband. She said
we should all sing and bring some happiness into the house.
One of our team played fiddle and we ended up dancing and
singing in our smelly socks and sweaters while she stood watching
and smiling, tears streaming down her cheeks.
On another walk five years earlier that
same fiddler was playing a tin whistle. It was a very hot
day and we were taking a rest. The sound enchanted a woman
in her house and she brought us all in for home-made lemonade.
Then there was this old cottage on a rough
lane near the Wye valley. It was overgrown and virtually derelict;
the only sign of life was a bucket of coal by the door. Peeping
through the window you could see a shrivelled old woman sitting
in front of the fire waiting to die. For two years I saw her
there, then one year, no coal, and a single pane of glass
broken. She had gone.
But it is hard to isolate incidents because
events and weather, a fox or a heron, even accidents and unpleasant
encounters with landowners; everything arises out of what's
gone before and all you have been feeling. Each journey is
a single adventure.
S.K.: What sort of farms do you choose to put your camp
on?
L.G.: When I'm planning the walk
I arrive at a place I feel is ideal to stop; perhaps because
it is sheltered and by a stream; perhaps because it is exposed
and dramatic. I find out who it belongs to and ask permission.
Usually they say yes. Where I think we are not welcome, or
if there's too much fuss confirming permission each year,
I look for a different site. In time we achieve a series of
sympathetic farms who aren't put out by us arriving out of
the blue. Often the path we take to get to our field has been
blocked by the very farmer with whom we are camping. So often
farmers aren't aware the paths are used, or simply don't bother
to make a break in the barbed wire as they unroll it for a
new fence.
S.K.: What kind of people come?
L.G.: Mostly professional people
in their 20s, 30s and 40s, but quite a few older people and
students too. Occasionally a parent with a child. You can
rely on a child to show us all how to enjoy whatever the weather.
S.K.: Mostly people working in cities?
L.G.: Mostly city and townspeople,
but quite a few country dwellers and a number from abroad
too.
S.K.: What about the relationship between people who come?
L.G.: Time and again I have discovered
that appearances are very deceptive. In the simple day-to-day
reality of travelling together a person's experience, class,
age, education, philosophy or politics are not their key qualities.
Much more significant is their personality and temperament;
their concern, kindness, generosity of spirit; their ability
to notice what needs doing and responding; sensitivity to
the presence of nature. It is our awareness we ultimately
communicate to each other.
S.K.: So this is also an experience of forming relationships?
L.G.: It can be. Many friendships
have started on walks; several couples initially met on a
walk. It is a situation in which natural spirit is allowed,
encouraged, to flow. It is hard to maintain a pretence for
easy to be open and communicative. This need not be intense.
You can be surprisingly private withinthe group, too, either
when walking - spread over the landscape - or at camp gazing
out from the seclusion of your personal sleeping tent.
S.K.: And how about their relationship with you? Do you
have any correspondence, do you remember them, do they remember
you?
L.G.: Oh yes. I've made many friends.
People write, send photos and, of course, come back. Some
end up helping me: half of the people who work with it originally
came on walks.
S.K.: And what sort of experience do they have, what do
they see?
L.G.: It's very diverse and the feedback
is delayed. People often don't register the experience until
two or three weeks later. At the beginning, moods are very
mixed. There is a three day period of adjustment. By the fourth
day the group, whatever its make-up, is settled. People feel
at home, they get lighter and lighter until, by the end, things
are almost running themselves. It's great fun then. Anxieties
and personal patterns of routine are forgotten. When they
return to all that, I hope it is with fresh energy. Some tell
me they spend times remembering each stage of the walk; it
is a pool of peace within them. It is surprisingly easy to
remember the details of a path when you walk with concentration.
The spectrum of emotions you pass through
when walking is like the landscape itself. You have hills
to climb, peaks that are reached, and downhills rolling away.
Sometimes when you are climbing a hill you get quite depressed
and start feeling your mortality. And as you struggle up,
all the fears, all the things that beset and depress you start
to rise to the surface. What is happenening is that you are
finding the hills in yourself. Then you reach the top and
behold the panorama, and however low you sank is surpassed
by the height you suddenly spring to. That whole area of confusion
is thrown into relief and you can see how superficial it is;
how it is merely the landscape reflected within. After days
of this you get a clearer perspective on your problems. You
realise how much we are corks in the sea of prevailing influences.
Our journey is, in microcosm, a journey of life.
end
|